| 12 Nov 2023 |
|  @teutat3s:pub.solar left the room. | 19:22:44 |
| 13 Nov 2023 |
|  Greg Burd changed their profile picture. | 15:41:45 |
 Philip Taron (UTC-8) | Apologies if there's a better room for this.
For the NixOS 23.11 release, how much of a problem is this list of evaluation errors? I took a look at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/265948 and didn't see something that definitively answered this question.
https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1801638#tabs-errors | 17:48:01 |
 K900 | Not a problem | 17:48:15 |
| K900 | Hydra simply skips packages that don't evaluate | 17:48:24 |
| K900 | And most of those are expected failures because of unfree licenses or packages marked broken | 17:48:53 |
| K900 | Also, ZHF doesn't literally mean "reach 0 failures or die", and it doesn't mean "nothing is marked broken" | 17:49:12 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | Thanks, K900 ⚡️ . Is there a way to cause Hydra to "triage" known evaluation errors so that "real" evaluation errors are highlighted? | 17:51:24 |
| K900 | Generally, "everything that should eval evals" is ~enforced by ofborg | 17:51:48 |
| K900 | So it's not something you need to look at closely | 17:52:08 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | Got it. I'll direct my attention elsewhere. Thanks for the information! | 18:06:37 |
| 14 Nov 2023 |
|  @vyls:matrix.org left the room. | 18:21:23 |
