!zghijEASpYQWYFzriI:nixos.org

Hydra

376 Members
108 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
4 Apr 2024
@darkwater4213:matrix.orgdarkwater4213One could argue that it would be more aptly named Hydra, for obvious reasons.09:04:27
@k900:0upti.meK900Because Hydra was never designed for this kind of setup09:04:27
@k900:0upti.meK900I don't care about the philosophical implications of naming things here09:04:56
@k900:0upti.meK900We already have a thing called Hydra and that thing can't do what you want, and probably won't ever be able to09:05:10
@k900:0upti.meK900If you make a new thing, you're free to call it whatever you want, including Hydra09:05:20
@k900:0upti.meK900(though it would be confusing for everyone involved)09:05:26
@darkwater4213:matrix.orgdarkwater4213

It's still a fascinating prospect.

I've been toying with the idea of NixOS-as-MDM for some time now. It just occurred to me as I was brushing my teeth that most MDM solutions require a central server (if not all) and that can get expensive and inconvenient. Decentralizing the entire thing makes it more portable, flexible, and frankly, way cooler.

I was thinking of a guy who installed some distributed-computation software on all his school's computers, so he could build an entire Gentoo system, DE and all, in ninety seconds flat (not counting transfer times). Then it occurred to me that if all those machines were the same architecture, there's no reason those compiled objects could not be reused with the exact same optimizations. And since there's already no "central server" (because all of them are servers), you could unify this entire mess into a NixOS config, and you've got yourself a hype train straight out of 2014.

I need sleep.

09:10:17
@k900:0upti.meK900MDM has absolutely nothing to do with Hydra09:10:48

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6