| 17 Jan 2024 |
 @delroth:delroth.net | it's not like I'll be deploying it either until then anyway :) | 23:44:13 |
| @delroth:delroth.net | so it can wait, unless someone else is planning to deploy it | 23:44:21 |
| 18 Jan 2024 |
 John Ericson | OK | 00:01:00 |
| 21 Jan 2024 |
|  @autiboy:matrix.org left the room. | 23:09:25 |
| 23 Jan 2024 |
| John Ericson | https://github.com/NixOS/hydra/pull/1341 is a tiny thing if anyone wants to take a look | 17:22:24 |
| John Ericson | otherwise I'll just merge | 17:22:27 |
| John Ericson | (no code is changed, only a struct) | 17:22:36 |
| @delroth:delroth.net | John Ericson: https://github.com/NixOS/hydra/pull/1341/files#diff-0e7b6b6b57906dff7078309c6bef4ad2b354478ad474fa7d102591652c1dd4afR155 somehow after like 15 years of doing C++ professionally I seemingly still don't understand it - how does that even work? | 17:44:18 |
| @delroth:delroth.net | specifically: how can a ::Machine get built from a nix::Machine there | 17:44:53 |
| John Ericson | delroth: The ::machine has no fields which have to be set construction time, it just needs the new super class to be construct=ed | 17:45:45 |
| @delroth:delroth.net | sure, but there isn't a ::Machine constructor from nix::Machine here, as far as I can tell - is that implicitly defined? | 17:47:48 |
| John Ericson | delroth: yes that is implicitly defined | 17:49:23 |
| John Ericson | merely because ::Machine has no explicit constructor, and it has the public base class | 17:49:44 |
