| 31 Oct 2024 |
 ma27 | In reply to @ctheune:matrix.flyingcircus.io
Eelco: I'm wondering whether the namedConstituents feature should be working correctly when used recursively ... I'm seeing weird results where a job (release) that has another job (tested) as a constituent that in turn has constituents (the tests) only lists the tested job as a build dependency but not as a constituents and becomes green in hydra before tested actually has all its constituents fulfilled ... ftr I can confirm that this is a bug: the release job gets the tested derivation, but the original form with constituents being strings rather than added as input drvs. | 12:56:41 |
| 2 Nov 2024 |
 pbsds | https://hydra.nixos.org/build/276629352 builds fine for me, could use a restart | 02:46:27 |
|  drownbes changed their display name from Artem Markov to drownbes. | 08:42:17 |
| 3 Nov 2024 |
|  Marco Turchetto left the room. | 16:15:53 |
| Marco Turchetto joined the room. | 16:20:17 |
| 5 Nov 2024 |
|  @grossmap:in.tum.de left the room. | 14:16:21 |
|  @danmax:envs.net left the room. | 15:34:00 |
| 6 Nov 2024 |
|  Viorel-Cătălin Răpițeanu changed their display name from Viorel-Cătălin Răpițeanu to @catalin:one.ems.host. | 07:07:48 |
| 10 Nov 2024 |
|  Magic_RB changed their profile picture. | 17:48:34 |
| 12 Nov 2024 |
|  pfhuh joined the room. | 05:55:00 |
| 13 Nov 2024 |
|  Inayet joined the room. | 22:16:32 |
| 15 Nov 2024 |
|  @asymmetric:matrix.dapp.org.uk left the room. | 11:46:10 |
 John Ericson | das_j: Mic92 should we decide for nix-eval-jobs? | 16:24:18 |
| John Ericson | * das_j: Mic92 should we decide for nix-eval-jobs and Hydra? | 16:24:24 |
| John Ericson | I was would like to see the code dedup done :) | 16:24:34 |
| John Ericson | meson one is passing now too, nicely | 16:24:46 |
| John Ericson | With these changes, we can do one mega dev shell with nix perl bindings, nix-eval-jobs, and hydra, and change everything at once if we want :D | 16:25:39 |
 Mic92 | John Ericson: you want one mega repo? | 17:15:41 |
| John Ericson | Mic92: nope! | 17:15:50 |
| John Ericson | just I unpack a bunch of repos locally | 17:15:58 |
| John Ericson | and then make separate PRs | 17:16:07 |
 @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de | In reply to @Ericson2314:matrix.org
das_j: Mic92 should we decide for nix-eval-jobs and Hydra? I repeat my Github point which is that there is currently nobody willing and/or capable of maintaining that in-tree for hydra | 17:48:36 |
| @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de | So it can only go up from here | 17:48:42 |
| John Ericson | @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de: maybe I saw those words twice but didn't understand them | 19:42:15 |
 @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl | Thanks for fixing up CA derivations while you were at it 🙌🏼, guess it was a useful test to add 😶🌫️ | 20:02:38 |
| John Ericson | Mindavi: oh you can be sure I won't cause a CA regression haha | 20:03:56 |
| John Ericson | In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
So it can only go up from here are you saying it is worth merging? because no one wants to maintain hydra-eval-jobs? | 20:04:55 |
| @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl | I would think it's a good thing to use nix-eval-jobs in hydra instead of trying to maintain in the hydra repo | 20:07:26 |
| John Ericson | Mindavi: I think we all agree, I just don't wanna merge my own PR | 20:08:58 |
| @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de | In reply to @Ericson2314:matrix.org
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de: maybe I saw those words twice but didn't understand them I'm sorry, not sure what was wrong with my grammar. The hydra component lacks maintainership which makes a switch to a maintained component a good idea. Is this grammar more understandable? | 21:39:30 |
