!zghijEASpYQWYFzriI:nixos.org

Hydra

393 Members
110 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
14 Feb 2022
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.orgbut that was quite a bit more complicated 14:29:55
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.dedas_jor each component just writes its stats into the main db and we scrape from there14:29:59
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.orgso it could very well work here14:30:00
@pedrohlc:mozilla.org@pedrohlc:mozilla.org joined the room.15:13:45
15 Feb 2022
@packetgrill:automattic.com@packetgrill:automattic.com joined the room.13:32:31
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux Hackerman So I'm trying to update the hydra package in nixpkgs, and ran into migrations failing because the pgcrypto postgres extension was missing. Seems odd to me though that this wouldn't have been caught by NixOS tests. Has everyone who runs a hyra done CREATE EXTENSION pgcrypto; manually, or am I missing a place where that's done within hydra (a plain rg pgcrypto on the hydra repo didn't yield any results), or what might be happening here? 16:45:49
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux Hackerman * So I'm trying to update the hydra package in nixpkgs, and ran into migrations failing because the pgcrypto postgres extension was missing. Seems odd to me though that this wouldn't have been caught by NixOS tests. Has everyone who runs a Hydra done CREATE EXTENSION pgcrypto; manually, or am I missing a place where that's done within hydra (a plain rg pgcrypto on the hydra repo didn't yield any results), or what might be happening here? 16:45:55
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux Hackerman Aah, apparently gen_random_uuid() is built into postgres starting from 13.x 16:49:57
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.dedas_j
In reply to @linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.de
So I'm trying to update the hydra package in nixpkgs, and ran into migrations failing because the pgcrypto postgres extension was missing. Seems odd to me though that this wouldn't have been caught by NixOS tests. Has everyone who runs a Hydra done CREATE EXTENSION pgcrypto; manually, or am I missing a place where that's done within hydra (a plain rg pgcrypto on the hydra repo didn't yield any results), or what might be happening here?
Ah if you're touching it anyway (I know people love when I say that - could you replace --set HYDRA_RELEASE ${version} \ with --set-default HYDRA_RELEASE ${version} \? I don't think it's worth its own PR
16:51:14
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux Hackermanlol16:51:31
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux Hackermanyeah can do that16:51:37
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.dedas_jthanks ;)16:51:42
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlRick (Mindavi)
In reply to @linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.de
So I'm trying to update the hydra package in nixpkgs, and ran into migrations failing because the pgcrypto postgres extension was missing. Seems odd to me though that this wouldn't have been caught by NixOS tests. Has everyone who runs a Hydra done CREATE EXTENSION pgcrypto; manually, or am I missing a place where that's done within hydra (a plain rg pgcrypto on the hydra repo didn't yield any results), or what might be happening here?
Thanks for looking into that.
17:08:44
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux Hackermanthanks for starting the work, I picked your commit as a base :)17:09:00
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux Hackerman das_j: hm, why exactly should that be --set-default? Changing that to something other than the running package seems weird. 17:14:35
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.dedas_j
In reply to @linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.de
das_j: hm, why exactly should that be --set-default? Changing that to something other than the running package seems weird.
I'm overriding the src of the package locally and the postPatch is not affected by that override
17:15:03
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux Hackermanaah fair17:16:20
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux Hackerman das_j: Rick (Mindavi): would you care to be maintainers as well? With https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/158948 it doesn't currently have any maintainers. 19:01:50
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.dedas_j
In reply to @linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.de
das_j: Rick (Mindavi): would you care to be maintainers as well? With https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/158948 it doesn't currently have any maintainers.
Yeah why not. Will probably not give me substantially more GH notifications 🤷
19:05:31
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlRick (Mindavi)I'm running it from nixpkgs anyway, so don't mind reviewing now and then19:08:40
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux Hackermansweet, so the package goes from 1 to 0 to 3 maintainers :D19:08:43
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux HackermanHm, I've been trying to mix lovesegfault's changes from https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/157072 in as well. Not sure if this is actually something we should do or not though19:27:08
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux HackermanI think it does make sense to have a single version of hydra in nixpkgs. And I think the hydra package in nixpkgs is a bit "second-class" given that upstream development and the hno deployment use flakes.19:31:13
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux HackermanAny opinions?19:31:33
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux HackermanThough I'm pretty sure that if we have only a single hydra package, we should also only have a single hydra test :)19:31:50
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux Hackerman * Though I'm pretty sure that if we have only a single hydra package, we should also only have a single hydra test, so if I do pull in lovesegfault's changes I'll also add that :)19:33:27
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlRick (Mindavi)
In reply to @linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.de
Any opinions?
My opinion is that we should have only 1 version. One can always override if need be
19:49:31
@linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.deLinux HackermanI've opened https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/160202 with the current state, it's not quite finished yet though.19:53:34
16 Feb 2022
@packetgrill:automattic.com@packetgrill:automattic.com left the room.06:09:17
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27
In reply to @linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.de
I think it does make sense to have a single version of hydra in nixpkgs. And I think the hydra package in nixpkgs is a bit "second-class" given that upstream development and the hno deployment use flakes.
agreed. The multiple package thing is a relict from https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/83600
14:14:33

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6