| 23 Sep 2021 |
 mbprtpmnr | hydra-eval-jobs returned exit code 1:
error: Please be informed that this pseudo-package is not the only part of
Nixpkgs that fails to evaluate. You should not evaluate entire Nixpkgs
without some special measures to handle failing packages, like those taken
by Hydra.
error: Failed to evaluate LAStools-201003: «unfree»: has an unfree license (‘unfree’)
error: Failed to evaluate LAStools-201003: «unfree»: has an unfree license (‘unfree’)
error: Failed to evaluate LAStools-201003: «unfree»: has an unfree license (‘unfree’)
error: Failed to evaluate ldc-1.27.1: «unsupported»: is not supported on ‘aarch64-linux’
error: Failed to evaluate seabios-1.14.0: «unsupported»: is not supported on ‘aarch64-linux’
error: Failed to evaluate acpica-tools-20210730: «unsupported»: is not supported on ‘x86_64-darwin’
error: Failed to evaluate acpica-tools-20210730: «unsupported»: is not supported on ‘x86_64-darwin’
error: Failed to evaluate acpica-tools-20210730: «unsupported»: is not supported on ‘x86_64-darwin’
error: unexpected EOF reading a line
| 15:43:07 |
 Rick (Mindavi) | It would be wise to add a branchname, but I guess it'll default to whatever git defaults to | 15:44:10 |
| mbprtpmnr | Is master branch... | 15:45:06 |
| Rick (Mindavi) | Yes | 15:45:17 |
| Rick (Mindavi) | Config seems to be ok otherwise? I don't see any obvious issues | 15:46:00 |
| mbprtpmnr | In reply to @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl
Config seems to be ok otherwise? I don't see any obvious issues error: Failed to evaluate LAStools-201003: «unfree»: has an unfree license (‘unfree’) and error: Failed to evaluate acpica-tools-20210730: «unsupported»: is not supported on ‘x86_64-darwin’ | 15:46:40 |
 ajs124 | In reply to @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl
It would be wise to add a branchname, but I guess it'll default to whatever git defaults to it defaults to master | 15:46:53 |
| ajs124 | it does not default to the default branch of the remote, for reasons | 15:47:09 |
| mbprtpmnr | In reply to @andreas.schraegle:helsinki-systems.de
it does not default to the default branch of the remote, for reasons And how can I set to other branch? | 15:47:54 |
| Rick (Mindavi) | Put the name behind the url | 15:48:10 |
| ajs124 | space after the uri and then the name | 15:48:11 |
| mbprtpmnr | In reply to @andreas.schraegle:helsinki-systems.de
space after the uri and then the name https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs.git master https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs.git nixos-unstable like that? | 15:49:10 |
| Rick (Mindavi) | Yeah | 15:49:28 |
| mbprtpmnr | Big problem here .... :))) ```
Sep 23 18:51:50 nixos-server kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 69971 (hydra-eval-jobs) total-vm:759624kB, anon-rss:666904kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB, UID:122 pgtables:1476kB oom_score_adj:0
| 15:53:03 |
| mbprtpmnr | * Big problem here .... :)))
Sep 23 18:51:50 nixos-server kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 69971 (hydra-eval-jobs) total-vm:759624kB, anon-rss:666904kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB, UID:122 pgtables:1476kB oom_score_adj:0 | 15:53:33 |
 das_j | https://downloadmoreram.com/ | 15:53:53 |
| mbprtpmnr | In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
https://downloadmoreram.com/ Yeah, sure... :))) | 15:54:46 |
| das_j | yeah :D but the only way of preventing this is getting more RAM | 15:55:27 |
| das_j | Nix evals are quite memory hungry | 15:55:33 |
| das_j | well also depends on the job you execute. evaluating all packages and tests takes a lot more memory than just evaluating a subset, of course | 15:56:06 |
| mbprtpmnr | I think I need to resize my VPS... | 15:57:03 |
| das_j | by a lot probably. we are evaluating our own systems and a subset of packages and we are really using our 128GB of memory | 15:58:03 |
| das_j | well, we also do parallel evals, so not doing that will probably help :D | 15:58:21 |
| ajs124 | and we give our postgres a bunch of memory | 15:58:40 |
| das_j | yeah, to make the web interface more bearable | 15:58:56 |
| mbprtpmnr | In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
well, we also do parallel evals, so not doing that will probably help :D parallel evals = distributed builds ...? I just ask because for me sounds the same...? | 15:59:21 |
| ajs124 | also made a bunch of errors disappear. although that probably wasn't the memory but the connection limits etc. | 15:59:21 |
| das_j | no, evals != builds | 15:59:50 |
| mbprtpmnr | well, i have 2 vps with nixos, can i make parallel eval? | 16:00:14 |
| das_j | you can't | 16:00:22 |
