| 11 Mar 2025 |
 aloisw | In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
they used scripted initrd and added a *Commands fragment that pulled in some super massive package because scripted initrd pulls in whole closures Why did it only blow up on 25.05 then? | 18:06:07 |
 ElvishJerricco | it's weird | 18:06:07 |
| ElvishJerricco | systemd-boot or systemd-stub will pass the initrd via a custom uefi protocl | 18:06:22 |
| ElvishJerricco | ... yea good point nevermind | 18:06:37 |
| aloisw | In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
systemd-boot or systemd-stub will pass the initrd via a custom uefi protocl Oh wait, it's only the kernel that decompresses it. Ignore what I said then. | 18:07:10 |
| ElvishJerricco | yea.... | 18:07:27 |
| ElvishJerricco | certainly the issue must have to do with the massive initrd; that's such a strange and blatant variable | 18:08:22 |
| ElvishJerricco | but I have no idea why | 18:08:26 |
| aloisw | (Unless for some reason it fails to do a contiguous allocation of the 358.5 megabytes, but that's not that much from remote speculation.) | 18:08:27 |
