!GsmxjHfeAYLsTEQmjS:nixos.org

Matrix Meta (Nix)

666 Members
Discuss your proposals for the Matrix space here, before suggesting them in #matrix-suggestions:nixos.org192 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
25 Jun 2021
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️i recognize that my ideal of getting rid of it in one fell swoop is maybe unrealistic03:44:26
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️i do think it's the quickest way out but maybe not the most agreeable03:44:46
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)Here it is: https://demo.hedgedoc.org/uyQYTpTVQbyvpdcJ6MvlQg?view#Unofficial-Flakes-Roadmap03:45:04
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
Lets deflate the problem
03:45:12
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao) *

Lets deflate the problem ...

03:45:17
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
i do think it's the quickest way out but maybe not the most agreeable
I think with the right amount of deflation we can go back to a consensus point, indeed
03:45:47
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
i do think it's the quickest way out but maybe not the most agreeable
* I think with the right amount of deflation we can go back to a consensus point, indeed 🤣
03:46:00
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️i still stand by my statements of not caring what happens to flakes and just wanting them gone03:46:41
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️so that's the point i want to reach03:46:48
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️and maybe when they're reintroduced through a proper process i'll be more comfortable with it all03:47:20
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️if you want my real opinion, i think unstable nix should not be in nixpkgs at all, nor should nix flakes03:49:34
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️one should have to go out of their way to get an unstable version of nix directly from the nix repo, because they're working on its development03:50:13
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️having it so easily accessible promotes use of unstable features, which influences workflows and results in dependence on unstable stuff03:51:14
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️maybe i'm wrong. idk03:51:19
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)It's diabolic poitics at play 😁03:55:20
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens 🏳️‍🌈Redacted or Malformed Event06:39:51
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens 🏳️‍🌈Redacted or Malformed Event06:40:10
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens 🏳️‍🌈Redacted or Malformed Event06:42:20
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens 🏳️‍🌈same ole flakes FUD06:42:45
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens 🏳️‍🌈
In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
i can barely look at the main nix support channel because there's always someone asking for help with flakes and i hate it
maybe that's a sign it addresses a serious, real pain point?
06:43:40
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens 🏳️‍🌈"having it so easily accessible promotes use of unstable features, which influences workflows and results in dependence on unstable stuff"06:48:11
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens 🏳️‍🌈.... is there an actual example?06:48:20
@jez:petrichor.meJez (he/him)I feel like a big part of the problem is that so much of the knowledge of how nix works and how to use it exists only in the heads of community members 07:00:33
@jez:petrichor.meJez (he/him)The documentation is structured such that even if what you want to know is documented, it's really hard to find 07:01:23
@jez:petrichor.meJez (he/him) The introductions to flakes that are generally promoted are conceptual introductions that make an argument for established nix-ers why flakes are useful, but don't really go into much detail about how to use them in practice 07:03:24
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️
In reply to @colemickens:matrix.org
same ole flakes FUD
i'm not just spreading fud, i'm concerned about the reliance on unstable features. like i said, i don't have a horse in the flakes race
07:05:02
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️i just want new features to go through the proper process07:05:23
@jez:petrichor.meJez (he/him)I wonder if that's also why "nix 3" and flakes are taking so long to stabilise, because so few people understand the whole picture of where they fit in 07:05:29
@jez:petrichor.meJez (he/him)What is the proper process? (genuine question as a relative newbie to this community) 07:06:14
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️
In reply to @jez:petrichor.me
What is the proper process? (genuine question as a relative newbie to this community)
the proper process would be finishing the rfc process and getting the rfc merged, then working on an implementation after everyone's satisfied with the details
07:07:21

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6