| 19 Feb 2024 |
 pedrohlc ⚡️ | Yeah, K900 brought the idea of “we should make libgbm a loader-only lib”, meanwhile as I couldn't do that at in my repo, I made that patch that “changes the default-fallback backend to something different” | 12:57:40 |
 K900 | I do still want to fix that | 12:59:44 |
| K900 | Upstream | 12:59:48 |
| K900 | But need spoons | 12:59:55 |
| pedrohlc ⚡️ | I brought other ideas to the table before, like putting mesa's hash as the GBM backend's name, this would make it compatible with NixOS and non-NixOS scenarios, and support all different builds -- but hell that's yet another hack | 13:00:02 |
| K900 | I mean technically we don't even have to do that | 13:00:41 |
| K900 | We can just load the libgbm impurely always | 13:00:50 |
| K900 | And then we'll have exactly one libgl and exactly one GBM backend | 13:01:00 |
| K900 | All we need is to split the GBM backend out of Mesa | 13:01:13 |
| K900 | And install it with the right name | 13:01:22 |
| K900 | And done | 13:01:23 |
| pedrohlc ⚡️ | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
But need spoons <insert kadabra or alakazam GIF here> | 13:04:26 |
 @atemu12:matrix.org | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
But need spoons Here you go:🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄 | 13:12:52 |
| K900 | As Gandhi said, be the Mesa developer you wanted to kidnap | 13:14:08 |
| K900 | Or something | 13:14:10 |
