| 27 Jan 2024 |
 K900 | As in, the active nixos may be built from another flake revision | 18:27:57 |
 x10an14 | In reply to @9hp71n:matrix.org
Not sure about useGlobalPkgs.
But even for standalone if they don't do follows wouldn't their sway and all its dependencies be from nixpkgs that is currently locked in HM repo ? I am doing nixpkgs follow on HM flake input | 18:49:20 |
| x10an14 | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
As in, the active nixos may be built from another flake revision This is true. I should get around to unifying. I'm just really enamored with the idea of having a HM config across all my machines (which might not all be NixOS) 100% independent from NixOS itself. | 18:50:12 |
| 28 Jan 2024 |
| K900 | In reply to@x10an14:matrix.org
This is true. I should get around to unifying. I'm just really enamored with the idea of having a HM config across all my machines (which might not all be NixOS) 100% independent from NixOS itself. I completely forgot that I wanted to write this | 11:04:09 |
| K900 | But you can still kinda do that | 11:04:15 |
| K900 | If you have a HM config as a module | 11:04:20 |
| K900 | You can import it standalone or into a NixOS config | 11:04:27 |
| x10an14 | I'm vaguely aware of this, but I haven't deep dived into leveraging nixos's HM module, or "connecting them" as to separately instantiated configurations (and if so, which of the myriad(?) of alternative ways). But thank you for ensuring I'm aware =) | 11:09:09 |
| K900 | Finally | 15:03:15 |
| K900 | All the yuzus are working again | 15:03:20 |
| K900 | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/283822 | 16:30:10 |
| K900 | Please test the yuzus | 16:30:13 |
