| 17 May 2023 |
 delroth | checking GUIX now, they don't have diffoscope outputs on their CI but they have NARs I can extract... | 15:11:31 |
| delroth | and every .ko.gz mismatches + System.map mismatch + bzImage mismatch | 15:12:26 |
| delroth | so might be the same BTF issue we've been having | 15:12:34 |
| delroth | anyway, the answer is that yes, there is a reproducible builds project with a dozen linux distros on it, but no, that doesn't mean the kernel builds reproducibly, in fact nobody seems to be able to at this point, and especially not "by default" :( | 15:15:54 |
| delroth | I suspect that Nix sandboxed might do the trick, the build-id diff in the VDSO should be entirely attributable to filename differences, and that shouldn't happen when sandboxed | 15:16:29 |
| delroth | (now, is it a good thing that we "hide" these sources of reproducibility with Nix? maybe, maybe not :) ) | 15:16:58 |
| delroth | * (now, is it a good thing that we "hide" these sources of unreproducibility with Nix? maybe, maybe not :) ) | 15:17:04 |
 @rnhmjoj:maxwell.ydns.eu | In reply to @delroth:delroth.net
anyway, the answer is that yes, there is a reproducible builds project with a dozen linux distros on it, but no, that doesn't mean the kernel builds reproducibly, in fact nobody seems to be able to at this point, and especially not "by default" :( but when NixOS briefly became 100% reproducible some time ago, was the kenrle included? | 15:18:25 |
| @rnhmjoj:maxwell.ydns.eu | * but when NixOS briefly became 100% reproducible some time ago, was the kernel included? | 15:18:37 |
 raitobezarius | necessarily I believe | 15:19:04 |
