| 11 Jan 2025 |
|  Fernando Rodrigues changed their display name from SigmaSquadron (Away until 2025-01-11) to SigmaSquadron. | 15:06:40 |
|  pandapip1 joined the room. | 21:22:18 |
| 12 Jan 2025 |
|  @strutztm:strutztm.de joined the room. | 00:23:59 |
| 15 Jan 2025 |
|  SomeoneSerge (matrix works sometimes) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge (utc+3) to SomeoneSerge. | 19:01:46 |
| 18 Jan 2025 |
|  sunny.nc joined the room. | 12:48:54 |
| 19 Jan 2025 |
|  Reventlov left the room. | 09:36:52 |
| 25 Jan 2025 |
|  @mlieberman85:matrix.org left the room. | 04:30:18 |
| 27 Jan 2025 |
 Julien | Hello, shameless plug: I have written a research paper (and a blog post) about the bitwise reproducibility levels in nixpkgs -> https://luj.fr/blog/is-nixos-truly-reproducible.html | 14:49:38 |
| Julien | The paper is here: https://hal.science/hal-04913007 | 14:50:29 |
 Martin Schwaighofer | Congrats! I read the post and upvoted it on HN, will read the paper in the following days. 😊 | 15:35:49 |
| Martin Schwaighofer | * Congrats! I read the post and upvoted it on HN. It's a great post. Will read the paper in the following days. 😊 | 15:36:24 |
 linj | How do you treat FODs, such as source codes of packages, in your experiment? Are they substituted from cache.nixos.org or built locally? Are they treated like other packages when classified into reproducible, rebuildable and non-rebuildable? I skimmed through your blog post and paper but did not find this information. | 16:18:36 |
