| 26 May 2021 |
 Gytis Ivaskevicius | 
Download image.png | 08:02:08 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | :D | 08:02:10 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | And dam, thats amassive image | 08:02:27 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | * And dam, thats a massive image | 08:02:41 |
 Jonas Chevalier | right, so gmp is still only compiled with GCC8 | 08:02:42 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | In reply to @zimbatm:numtide.com
right, so gmp is still only compiled with GCC8 gmp, mpfr, glibc, mpr | 08:03:02 |
| Jonas Chevalier | that's what I'm saying. If it was easier to update the bootstrap tools, we could do have them also built with gcc 10 | 08:03:37 |
| Jonas Chevalier | it wouldn't be the exact same GCC 10 but that doesn't really make a difference in terms of perf | 08:04:19 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | Yes, that would work. But is this really a solution? This would mean updating bootstrap tools with every major gcc update | 08:04:41 |
| Jonas Chevalier | I think both things are complementary | 08:06:43 |
| Jonas Chevalier | * I think both approaches are complementary | 08:06:51 |
| Jonas Chevalier | there is also the Gnu MES project that tries to bootstrap from a few bytes of verified assembly code | 08:07:47 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | Im going to be real with you - I think GNU MES is a cool idea, but not really realistic. Creates more problems than it solves | 08:08:39 |
| Jonas Chevalier | it's a cool idea though | 08:09:14 |
| Jonas Chevalier | bootstrapping is an exercise of balance | 08:09:37 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | And technically with additional stage we would never need to update boostrap tools 🤔 Unless ABIs were to become incompatible | 08:09:41 |
| Jonas Chevalier | we had that a while back with Go | 08:10:14 |
| Jonas Chevalier | the original Go could be compiled with C | 08:10:26 |
| Jonas Chevalier | then the next version with the previous one | 08:10:33 |
| Jonas Chevalier | at some point we had a stack of 8 versions, each compiled by the previous version | 08:10:55 |
 raboof | I guess we should add a NixOS page to https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/ - I'll have a stab over my lunch break :) | 08:10:52 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | Anyways, what you guys think next steps are with this? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/123467 | 08:13:02 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | Should I just start working on POC with additional stage? | 08:13:34 |
| Jonas Chevalier | we don't really have a team that owns the bootstrap phase | 08:20:10 |
| Jonas Chevalier | usually the best thing to do is to present a clean plan with motivation | 08:21:30 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | Could you elaborate on that? Here are few questions that come up:
- How should it be shaped? Is issue enough or should it be RFC?
- Does it need to include POC?
| 08:23:33 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | * Could you elaborate on that? Here are few questions that come up:
- How should it be shaped? Is github issue file or should it be RFC?
- Does it need to include POC?
| 08:24:01 |
| Gytis Ivaskevicius | * Could you elaborate on that? Here are few questions that come up:
- How should it be shaped? Is github issue fine or should it be RFC?
- Does it need to include POC?
| 08:24:08 |
| Jonas Chevalier | I'm still not sure what problem it's solving. I get that the previous GCC version is leaking, but why is it a problem. | 08:28:15 |
| Jonas Chevalier | I know I'm being annoying :) | 08:29:34 |
