| 13 Nov 2021 |
 baloo | * https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/145800 thankfully this is not a critical dependency that gcc depends on, and everyone's buildchain depends on. so that's cool | 22:00:30 |
| 14 Nov 2021 |
| baloo | so back to green on monday's build? | 03:57:52 |
| baloo | libuv? | 18:23:07 |
| 15 Nov 2021 |
| baloo | 1531 out of 1531 (100.00%) paths in the minimal installation image are reproducible!
Generated at 2021-11-15 09:32:22.171593516 UTC | 17:09:55 |
 toonn | Pretty cool. Is the next step basing stdenvs on Mes? : ) | 17:11:10 |
| baloo | mes? | 17:11:21 |
 Linux Hackerman | guix's minimal bootstrap effort | 17:11:40 |
| baloo | ha, yeah that would be cool | 17:11:53 |
 moritz.hedtke | How reproducible is e.g. the KDE installation image? Is there any data on that? | 17:31:13 |
 Rick (Mindavi) | Nope | 17:54:46 |
| Rick (Mindavi) | (i think?) | 17:54:55 |
| Rick (Mindavi) | There was a job for the gnome_iso, but it kept running out of space | 17:55:16 |
| 16 Nov 2021 |
 siraben | In reply to @toonn:matrix.org
Pretty cool. Is the next step basing stdenvs on Mes? : ) Yes please 🙏 | 02:45:51 |
| siraben | I'd love to look into that if anyone would like to collaborate, especially if they're familiar with how stdenv works | 02:46:30 |
 @grahamc:nixos.org | it'd be cool if someone extended the r13y website generator to make an index of various builds so we could highlight the reproducibility of the gnome iso as well as the minimal ISO on the homepage | 14:30:52 |
 tomberek | ref: https://r13y.com/iso_gnome/index.html any other overall builds that would be good to add? | 15:40:01 |
|  etrigan63 changed their profile picture. | 19:24:28 |
| 17 Nov 2021 |
 afontain | eh, /nix/store/0mn8d6cl3pv7py19q0k3lxnysvsvh5yi-attachment.cgi?id=359589.drv | 09:39:57 |
| afontain | (from https://r13y.com/iso_gnome/index.html) | 09:40:32 |
| moritz.hedtke | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/a0dbe47318bbab7559ffbfa7c4872a517833409f/pkgs/development/libraries/cogl/default.nix | 11:59:00 |
| moritz.hedtke | Don't know why they specifically are unchecked paths | 11:59:14 |
 @ninjatrappeur:alternativebit.fr | In reply to@afontain:gnugen.ch
(from https://r13y.com/iso_gnome/index.html) I was so confused to see pandoc landing on the minimal image. It's actually the gnome iso. We probably should change the page title, it's misleading. | 12:15:12 |
| @ninjatrappeur:alternativebit.fr | The binaries generated by GHC are currently not binary-stable. More info on https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/12935 | 12:16:42 |
| @ninjatrappeur:alternativebit.fr | * The binaries generated by GHC are currently not binary-stable. More info on https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/12935 .
TL;DR: the unique temporary names generated during compilation are not necessarily stable. Looking at diffoscope, we're exactly hitting that issue
Meaning don't expect | 12:17:52 |
| @ninjatrappeur:alternativebit.fr | In reply to@afontain:gnugen.ch
(from https://r13y.com/iso_gnome/index.html) * I was so confused to see pandoc landing on the minimal image. It's actually the gnome iso. We probably should change the page title, it's misleading.
[edit]: We're already aware of that, I should have backlogged the chat a bit more. Sorry about that. | 12:19:13 |
 j-k |
In openSUSE, we also made it deterministic using non-parallel builds for now
| 13:16:02 |
| j-k | although compiling pandoc with 1 thread doesnt sound fun | 13:16:23 |
|  towesfeb joined the room. | 21:06:02 |
| 18 Nov 2021 |
 r-burns | In reply to @siraben:matrix.org
I'd love to look into that if anyone would like to collaborate, especially if they're familiar with how stdenv works im very interested in this, would love to collab :) | 18:45:26 |
| 19 Nov 2021 |
| baloo | work just had a problem with file ordering, and two builder not behaving the same. | 23:52:16 |
