| 15 Sep 2025 |
emily | at that point you're basically rewriting Hadrian in Nix right? | 13:34:04 |
emily | or wait Hadrian doesn't even use Cabal right... | 13:34:11 |
emily | I can't keep all this stuff straight | 13:34:16 |
Teo (he/him) | This would be great. Whatever happens, it would be great if boot libs were built with nix and weren't special | 13:34:21 |
MangoIV | hadrian is shake based. | 13:34:41 |
emily | calling implicit params sugar feels a bit of a stretch to me, it has some pretty weird/deep semantics :) | 13:34:59 |
emily | but if you mean "can easily be removed much of the time" then fair | 13:35:09 |