| 29 May 2021 |
Las | *
Can #haskell:nixos.org 's topic be made to link to #haskell:matrix.org directing users interested in asking non-Hix related general Haskell questions. from srid in #matrix-suggestions:nixos.org
| 19:10:21 |
| maralorn changed the room topic to "For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://haskell4nix.readthedocs.io/ | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell #haskell-space:matrix.org" from "For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://haskell4nix.readthedocs.io/". | 19:12:28 |
| maralorn changed the room topic to "For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://haskell4nix.readthedocs.io/ | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org" from "For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://haskell4nix.readthedocs.io/ | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell #haskell-space:matrix.org". | 19:13:29 |
maralorn | srid: Las: Are you okay with this? | 19:14:25 |
maralorn | (I really like how this room bridges channels.) | 19:14:35 |
maralorn | * (I really like how this room bridges spaces.) | 19:14:44 |
Las | That looks nice to me | 19:14:43 |
Las | wdym bridges spaces? | 19:14:55 |
maralorn | Las: It is part of the Haskell space and the nixos space. So if someone finds one of those spaces they have now a likely chance to discover the other one, too. | 19:15:59 |
Las | What haskell space? | 19:16:12 |
Las | I had never considered that that was possible, but it makes sense. | 19:16:35 |
maralorn | The one in the topic. ;-) | 19:16:48 |
Las | Ah, lol | 19:16:57 |
Las | I didn't read what was written carefully, just copied and pasted it | 19:17:15 |
maralorn | I actually didn‘t link exactly the Haskell room but the space. Which seems slightly better to me, but not sure. | 19:18:05 |
Las | No I think that's best | 19:18:25 |
Las | There isn't a backward link to the containing rooms otherwise after all. | 19:18:39 |
Las | * There isn't a backward link to the containing spaces otherwise after all. | 19:18:46 |
| 30 May 2021 |
cdepillabout | Man, our darwin builds really just aren't moving at all. | 02:55:28 |
maralorn | I think they are the same builds that are keeping staging-next. | 03:15:51 |
cdepillabout | maralorn: Do you mean there is also a queue on staging-next, and that is what is keeping our jobs from getting run? | 04:14:15 |
| hxliew joined the room. | 05:35:02 |
| fgaz joined the room. | 11:06:18 |
| rizary_andika (@rizary_:matrix.org) (@rizary:matrix.org) joined the room. | 17:42:14 |
| 31 May 2021 |
| kosmikus joined the room. | 06:28:26 |
maralorn | In reply to @cdepillabout:matrix.org maralorn: Do you mean there is also a queue on staging-next, and that is what is keeping our jobs from getting run? I am not sure but I think the same jobs that we are waiting for were also uncompleted in staging-next. Although they probably have different hashes. | 07:51:44 |
maralorn | I find this deeply unsatisfying. If I understood it correctly one of the reasons that we have such a hard time for getting darwin builders is apples restrictive licensing. | 07:54:36 |
maralorn | I don't like that our volunteer efforts for free software are being hampered by this at all. I vote for any solutions that make us less bothered by darwin builds. | 07:58:42 |
maralorn | * I find this deeply unsatisfying. If I understood it correctly one of the reasons that we have such a hard time getting darwin builders is apples restrictive licensing. | 07:59:16 |
maralorn | With that I mean: Let's deactivate all failing darwin build as soon as possible. And I guess I would even like to ignore unfinished darwin builds when merging. But that's probably hard to argue for. | 08:03:11 |