!RjBlCIbsLDzHBIzmaA:nixos.org

NixOS on ARM

990 Members
NixOS on ARM: now with more ARM! — Support: AArch64; armv6 and armv7 are best effort, without any official cache. — Documentation: https://nixos.wiki/wiki/NixOS_on_ARM — Community build box: https://github.com/nix-community/aarch64-build-box → build box status: https://status.nixos.org/grafana/d/5LANB9pZk/per-instance-metrics?orgId=1&refresh=30s&var-instance=147.75.77.190 —244 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
24 May 2021
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr hexa: yeah, fixed in the following board design, can be fixed if you have the electronics rework experience required 01:09:20
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrso yeah, now that I have something to work off of, I can start setting it up, then pare down to the minimum required changes on top of mainline01:09:50
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrbecause... WHEW does armbian not care (seemingly)01:10:02
@pennae:matrix.eno.spacepennae bookmarks shop link :D 01:10:43
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrand they went and somehow decided that they'd work with armbian for the only supported OS... at least that's my understanding and it might be wrong01:11:10
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrbut that rubs me a bit wrong01:11:14
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrbut yeah, being RK3399 it's a question of time and not a question if, for a proper mainline support01:12:28
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa
In reply to @samueldr:matrix.org
hexa: yeah, fixed in the following board design, can be fixed if you have the electronics rework experience required
which neither you nor I have :D
01:20:40
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldryep01:20:48
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrannoyingly, next design will include an ECC variant01:20:56
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawee01:21:01
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrand they're already talking about the new RK chip01:21:02
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathe A76 one I hope :D01:21:11
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrreally feels sore to be early adopters01:21:11
@hexa:lossy.networkhexayeah, that is annoying 01:21:23
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrRK356801:21:22
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaA55 then :<01:21:32
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldroh, maybe that' entirely for ECC01:22:05
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr * oh, maybe that's entirely for ECC01:22:14
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrand there won't be an RK3399 variant with ECC01:22:23
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahttps://www.cnx-software.com/2020/12/16/rockchip-rk3566-and-rk3568-datasheets-and-features-comparison/01:22:29
@hexa:lossy.networkhexayup01:22:32
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrA55 cores is probably fine here for a NAS use case01:22:52
@hexa:lossy.networkhexayup, I'm mostly looking for dual use with a bit of compute01:23:09
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldrI'd much rather have my build machine separate from the storage one :)01:23:27
@hexa:lossy.networkhexadoesn't need to build firefox, but please build a linux kernel in reasonable time01:23:29
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaon that matter, when will the aarch64 tier1/channel rfc go FPC?01:24:08
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawill there need to be a thursday, where the rfc committee chooses the sheperds01:24:26
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand then the sheperds go "FCP!"01:24:32
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathere seems to be no discussion since early march01:25:11

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6