!UUqahLbShAYkkrXmKs:matrix.org

DevOS

36 Members
Seeking help and geeking out together on https://github.com/divnix/devos & https://github.com/divnix/digga10 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
26 Jul 2021
@kraftnix:matrix.org@kraftnix:matrix.org * from repl it doesn't look like rnix-lsp provides an overlay, so in that case is the hacky way the right way to go about this? also I'm guessing this would break rnix-lsp if I had multiple architectures 16:46:25
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @kraftnix:matrix.org
from repl it doesn't look like rnix-lsp provides an overlay, so in that case is the hacky way the right way to go about this? also I'm guessing this would break rnix-lsp if I had multiple architectures
yep, in this case this is the right way. IN theory, you can even add packages directly via inputs.[...].mypackage to where you want to us them without going through an overlay, but I understand in this case you probably want to override the nixpkgs stock version.
16:49:39
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @kraftnix:matrix.org
from repl it doesn't look like rnix-lsp provides an overlay, so in that case is the hacky way the right way to go about this? also I'm guessing this would break rnix-lsp if I had multiple architectures
* yep, in this case this is the right way. In theory, you can even add packages directly via inputs.[...].mypackage to where you want to us them without going through an overlay, but I understand in this case you probably want to override the nixpkgs stock version.
16:50:02
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao) If there are multiple architectures, all those who are supported by rnix-lsp outputs should work out of the box. 16:51:31
@kraftnix:matrix.org@kraftnix:matrix.orgthanks for all the answers, i definitely have a better grasp of the interconnections now 👍️17:03:09
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgguys, check out this cancer https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/13158517:26:25
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgit was very interesting experience 😁17:26:41
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgwhat would be the easiest way to test runtime of everything?17:27:12
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgor is it "nixops v1 works, all good"17:27:22
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgI suppose you could iterate over pythonPackages and just count the backtraces 😆17:27:48
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgu wot now mate17:28:09
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org😆17:28:19
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgwelp, it failed yet again17:34:30
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.organd again :(17:50:35
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgdo you guys know how ofborg works? would love to execute that job locally17:50:51
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgwelp19:02:32
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgits over 19:02:34
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orghttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/13158519:02:35
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99This is relevant: https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/8822:44:07
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99 * I guess this is relevant: https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/8822:44:18
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99I think you would have to start with a warning that the python2 packages are going to be removed22:44:42
27 Jul 2021
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgyeah, I ended up with droping this idea anyways04:20:09
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgit is such a pain to pick out all the dependencies04:20:18
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.organd somehow in the background those dependencies seem to mix and match between 2.7 and 3.x04:20:40
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.organd you can already see how many of them i have went through, it was such a pain04:20:59
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgTL;DR: First we need to see nixops v1 deprecated04:21:11
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgthen we can talk04:21:17
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org
TL;DR: First we need to see nixops v1 deprecated
I have an aversion for (state-full) nixops, v1 & v2
21:31:54
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao) I'm considering the possibility of adding a lib api container to digga, so that we can have a more standardized take on: https://github.com/divnix/devos/blob/8b67cae20a110f296abf91cdba94a3946b1ba647/flake.nix#L92-L94 21:34:14
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)Such should give sensible guardrails to system-spaced libs, which I apparently happen to be using in every devos env so far.21:35:59

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6