!UUqahLbShAYkkrXmKs:matrix.org

DevOS

35 Members
Seeking help and geeking out together on https://github.com/divnix/devos & https://github.com/divnix/digga10 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
28 Oct 2021
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberekWe're talking about the same problem, but I'm not sure those are useful in practice. Maybe useful is the wrong word. Maybe "solid"? The "good faith" mantra easily becomes as heated and divisive as the original topics.18:17:24
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)I don't know, I don't have other words to describe somebody accusing me of something that I'm totally clean uf.18:18:16
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)* I don't know, I don't have other words to describe somebody accusing me of something that I'm totally clean of.18:18:28
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)(me or others)18:18:40
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberekIs part of it the unclear distinction between accusation and insinuation?18:20:01
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao) The act of assuming an enemy everywhere is a social death sentence. 18:20:44
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99

I just went through all the discussion(a very interesting situation to wake up to) and I cannot support you on this issue or the RFC in general.

There are many discussions that cannot happen on a public level. Whether it is for a security reason or safe space reason. In the community there are minority groups that want to be able to voice thoughts and vent to people who will support them, note support and echo chamber are not necessarily the same thing.

And in many of your messages I see a lack of empathy for groups facing these problems. For example there was a goal stated that there should be an assumption of safety in public discussions. While that is an admirable goal, it is simply not true, sexism, misogyny, and queerphobia exist and make public spaces feel dangerous and harmful. Just because you haven't "seen it", doesn't mean it doesn't exist, I feel like you might not even know what to look for.

I'm sure all of you have gone through some problem or issue in the past, and did you go out and tell the entire world about it? I assume you talked to a group you felt comfortable with and thats even the goal of support groups and safe spaces.

In no way do these spaces affect transparency, someone complaining about being misgendered or experiencing sexism is not affecting technical decisions of the nix world. If they do then it makes sense to point it out, but I have seen all technical decisions and governing decisions laid out in the open.

I have then seen the point that its ok for these rooms to exist but they shouldn't be official with the nixos.org tag. But if we dropped the nixos.org tag what message does that send? That the nixos organization doesn't support these groups? That the community doesn't care about their safety? Then those places are no longer safe spaces because they aren't discoverable and given community support. There just a room somewhere in the matrix void.

Do you really HAVE to know whats going on in those rooms that have no effect on you? Sure if there are decisions based on those discussions then I see your point, but I have yet to see that happen. These rooms in no way break the goal of good faith, we are creating a safe space with community support with the faith that they will be used wisely(which they have been). You are not being accused of being an enemy or a harmful person, this isn't about us, this is about people who want a space where they are guaranteed safety to voice frustrations and ideas.

18:35:06
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99 *

I just went through all the discussion(a very interesting situation to wake up to) and I cannot support you on this issue or the RFC in general.

There are many discussions that cannot happen on a public level. Whether it is for a security reason or safe space reason. In the community there are minority groups that want to be able to voice thoughts and vent to people who will support them, note support and echo chamber are not necessarily the same thing.

And in many of your messages I see a lack of empathy for groups facing these problems. For example there was a goal stated that there should be an assumption of safety in public discussions. While that is an admirable goal, it is simply not true, sexism, misogyny, and queerphobia exist and make public spaces feel dangerous and harmful. Just because you haven't "seen it", doesn't mean it doesn't exist, I feel like you might not even know what to look for.

I'm sure all of you have gone through some problem or issue in the past, and did you go out and tell the entire world about it? I assume you talked to a group you felt comfortable with and thats even the goal of support groups and safe spaces.

In no way do these spaces affect transparency, someone complaining about being misgendered or experiencing sexism is not affecting technical decisions of the nix world. If they do then it makes sense to point it out, but I have seen all technical decisions and governing decisions laid out in the open.

I have then seen the point that its ok for these rooms to exist but they shouldn't be official with the nixos.org tag. But if we dropped the nixos.org tag what message does that send? That the nixos organization doesn't support these groups? That the community doesn't care about their safety? Then those places are no longer safe spaces because they aren't discoverable and given community support. They're just a room somewhere in the matrix void.

Do you really HAVE to know whats going on in those rooms that have no effect on you? Sure if there are decisions based on those discussions then I see your point, but I have yet to see that happen. These rooms in no way break the goal of good faith, we are creating a safe space with community support with the faith that they will be used wisely(which they have been). You are not being accused of being an enemy or a harmful person, this isn't about us, this is about people who want a space where they are guaranteed safety to voice frustrations and ideas.

18:36:20
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberekEveryone seems to agree that if the room was "OSX enthusiasts - invite only" that it would be odd and improper for it to exist and operate as part of the org. Or is my assumption wrong? (i'm trying to start from a common baseline)18:39:24
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99I think thats a good assumption18:40:52
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberekOkay, and if we were talking about "Security" or "Nixos.org finances" i don't think it would get as heated/divisive. We can have reasonable discussion about exactly how much "lead time" the security channel should have, or if contracting decisions+deliberations by the Org should be public.18:42:23
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99 Aside from this issue, I'm really frustrated even a little angry at the fact that this room was put up as a sacrifice to prove a point. There are so many people involved in this project and you just assumed we were all okay with being dropped as a nixos.org room. I certainly want this room to have official nixos.org support. I'm disappointed that this room was tied to certain opinion in an argument as if we all just agree with your argument. This is specifically towards nrdxp and David Arnold (blaggacao). 18:45:11
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99 * Aside from this issue, I'm really frustrated even a little angry at the fact that this room was put up as a sacrifice to prove a point. There are so many people involved in this project and you just assumed we were all okay with being dropped as a nixos.org room. I certainly want this room to have official nixos.org support. I'm disappointed that this room was tied to certain opinion in an argument as if we all just agree with your point. This is specifically towards nrdxp and David Arnold (blaggacao). 18:45:33
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgwell to be fair pacman, he moved the room before I even asked him to18:46:07
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgI am currently extending and redrafting this RFC, as I have clearly hit the wrong note18:46:25
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99I saw the github discussion he most certainly agreed to your proposal and removed it18:46:38
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgthe reality though, is that there is a lot of conflict, which is becoming steadier in it's occurrence and bolder in it's execution18:46:44
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99
I'd like to formally request the removal of the DevOS room from the NixOS Matrix.

Sure, I've taken care of that.

18:46:45
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.org this is an attempt to stop that once and for all by codifying the primary (not the only) value of the nix community 18:47:02
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99^ How else am I supposed to interpret that interaction?18:47:05
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99 *

I'd like to formally request the removal of the DevOS room from the NixOS Matrix.

Sure, I've taken care of that.

18:47:30
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99 *

I'd like to formally request the removal of the DevOS room from the NixOS Matrix.

Sure, I've taken care of that.

18:47:37
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.org but I was still in the process of drafting that post when it was actually removed18:47:37
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgIt was an attempt, and quite probably a necessary one, to show that I would not make the same sacrifice that I am asking to be made of others18:48:28
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.org * It was an attempt, and quite probably a necessary one, to show that I would not hesitate to make the same sacrifice that I am asking to be made of others18:48:43
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99But its not your sacrifice to make! Its not just your room, there are many people here with different opinions.18:49:54
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgYou are right. I acted hastily, but do you understand what I am being accused of here?18:50:13
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgIt's not a justification by any means18:50:29
@timdeh:matrix.org@timdeh:matrix.orgIt's just what happened18:50:36
@pachumicchu:myrdd.infoPacman99I'm not entirely sure, I've read through a lot of the discussion and I didn't see an accusation. But if I missed something I'm sorry, can you explain what the accusation is?18:51:17

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6