Nix Package Manager development | 876 Members | |
| For people hacking on Nix: https://github.com/NixOS/nix Nix maintainers can be reached here. | 184 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2025 | ||
| Hey peeps, I unknowingly ran into the The point that I don't understand is that every architecture, aarch64, x64_86, etc. all have different hashes. However, I just want to build it for x64_86_linux. So how do I tell ofborg to only build on one architecture and why does the hash that works locally not work with ofborg? | 20:33:55 | |
| * Hey peeps, I unknowingly ran into the ´´´ The point that I don't understand is that every architecture, aarch64, x64_86, etc. all have different hashes. However, I just want to build it for x64_86_linux. So how do I tell ofborg to only build on one architecture and why does the hash that works locally not work with ofborg? | 20:35:08 | |
| * Hey peeps, I unknowingly ran into the
The point that I don't understand is that every architecture, aarch64, x64_86, etc. all have different hashes. However, I just want to build it for x64_86_linux. So how do I tell ofborg to only build on one architecture and why does the hash that works locally not work with ofborg? | 20:37:20 | |
| Well... now that I got another review, suddenly ofborg gives me output that it did successfully built the package for linux (aarch64 and x64_86) but failed for darwin. I am honestly confused as to how to interpret ofborg output. I would appreciate a quick explanation! | 21:16:19 | |
| More of a nixpkgs question generally: https://matrix.to/#/#users:nixos.org. But this might have to do with case sensitivity and whatnot | 23:44:15 | |
| 28 Oct 2025 | ||
| Eelco: | 00:29:23 | |
| * Eelco: as discussed during the meeeting, here's the constant-memory uploads to http binary caches: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/14390 | 00:29:54 | |
In reply to @xokdvium:matrix.orgThanks for the pointer! | 01:39:08 | |
| 01:43:26 | ||
| any good issues I can work on? | 01:58:23 | |
| I finished that NAR thing. | 01:58:26 | |
| @fzakaria:one.ems.host: perhaps a more long term solution to:https://github.com/GrahamDennis/nix/pull/8. We got team approval for "final" to be exposed so that locked fetches don't force a refetch if it already exists. | 02:10:55 | |