Does computeFSClosure(basicDrv.inputSrcs) + {drvPath} equal computeFSClosure(basicDrv.inputSrcs+ {drvPath}),
where drvPath is that of basicDrv (I didn't yet check how to compute one from the other)

EDIT: Specifically the edge case I'm interested in, is whether copyClosureTo(..., inputSrcs+{drvPath},...) equivalent to the original copyClosureTo(..., inputSrcs, ...) followed by exportPaths(..., {drvPath}), or does it potentially send more

Look at this, I am thinking it something caused by:
⁨⁨```cpp
: nixConfDir(canonPath(getEnvOsNonEmpty(OS_STR("NIX_CONF_DIR"))
.transform([](auto && s) { return std::filesystem::path(s); })
.value_or(resolveNixConfDir())))

Look at this, I am thinking it something caused by:

⁨⁨```cpp
: nixConfDir(canonPath(getEnvOsNonEmpty(OS_STR("NIX_CONF_DIR"))
.transform([](auto && s) { return std::filesystem::path(s); })
.value_or(resolveNixConfDir())))

Look at this, I am thinking it something caused by:

⁨⁨```
nixConfDir(canonPath(getEnvOsNonEmpty(OS_STR("NIX_CONF_DIR"))
.transform([](auto && s) { return std::filesystem::path(s); })
.value_or(resolveNixConfDir())))

Look at this, I am thinking it something caused by:

⁨⁨cpp nixConfDir(canonPath(getEnvOsNonEmpty(OS\_STR("NIX\_CONF\_DIR")) .transform(\[\](auto && s) { return std::filesystem::path(s); }) .value\_or(resolveNixConfDir())))

Look at this, I am thinking it something caused by:

⁨⁨nixConfDir(canonPath(getEnvOsNonEmpty(OS\_STR("NIX\_CONF\_DIR")) .transform(\[\](auto && s) { return std::filesystem::path(s); }) .value\_or(resolveNixConfDir())))

Look at this, I am thinking it something caused by:
⁨⁨```cpp
: nixConfDir(canonPath(getEnvOsNonEmpty(OS_STR("NIX_CONF_DIR"))
.transform([](auto && s) { return std::filesystem::path(s); })
.value_or(resolveNixConfDir())))

In reply to @eveeifyeve:matrix.org
Does anyone know how to run tests just by them selves without meson?? Because I am trying to run tests to get to the point of failing tests both locally and CI of this pr: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/actions/runs/21536152140/job/62062248779?pr=15041 to fix them and the docs example doesn't work.