!ZRgXNaHrdpGqwUnGnj:nixos.org

NixOS Security Triage

733 Members
Coordination and triage of security issues in nixpkgs220 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
15 Jun 2024
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa can you poke #macos:nixos.org? 21:35:09
@fack:cyberia.club@fack:cyberia.club left the room.21:51:56
16 Jun 2024
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat Isn't that affecting only if you use the libcurl as a SOCKS5 proxy? (server side) Or am I reading it wrong? 06:10:00
@bedridden:matrix.orgbedriddenI believe so, but I am no security expert. https://www.tenable.com/cve/CVE-2023-38545 has a references to few different updates (even ones from Apple updating curl version), so it seems rather important.09:58:11
@bedridden:matrix.orgbedridden That said, I was told in #macos:nixos.org that this issue doesn't affect nixos-24.05 (which I also verified and seems to be the case), so it might be an issue only on nixos-23.11 darwin (haven't yet verified this one). 09:59:28
@ilex:oakforest.inilexhttps://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/RELEASE-NOTES.md#7-0-413:07:30
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa

@emily

13:26:27
@me:indeednotjames.comemily?13:26:53
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaForgejo13:27:52
@me:indeednotjames.comemily

already in nixos-unstable-small and nixos-24.05-small. so what is left to do besides marking forgejo as insecure in 23.11?

(though it can be argued over if that CVE is actually all that bad)

13:29:50
@adam:robins.wtf@adam:robins.wtfthey did cut a 1.21 release too, but marking as insecure in 23.11 is fine with me :)13:33:10
@me:indeednotjames.comemily

23.11 is on 1.20, not 1.21.

and in the old gitea versioning those are major releases.

13:35:11
@me:indeednotjames.comemilydo you have time to open a PR for this? EOL+vulnerable?13:35:44
@adam:robins.wtf@adam:robins.wtfyeah i have a few minutes13:36:32

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6