!ZRgXNaHrdpGqwUnGnj:nixos.org

NixOS Security Triage

660 Members
Coordination and triage of security issues in nixpkgs | Discussions in #security-discuss:nixos.org | Open PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3A%221.severity%3A+security%22205 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
18 May 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900 @hexa:lossy.network 14:06:43
@me:linj.techlinjfixed in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/40823614:07:52
@k900:0upti.meK900Cool 14:08:29
@hexa:lossy.networkhexastill testing on 24.1114:08:58
19 May 2025
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)Can we get a merge on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/408524? Its analogous to the firefox update and i'd really rather have that.... Yes yes, we are on topic with browser forks, but i can't commit this (yet)14:56:55
@oak:universumi.fioak 🏳️‍🌈♥️ changed their display name from oak 🫱⭕🫲 to oak.10:59:05
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa note that we started requiring an active committer on the maintainers list for browsers cough 14:57:48
@oak:universumi.fioak 🏳️‍🌈♥️ changed their display name from oak to oak 🏳️‍🌈♥️.11:00:52
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyonly for new ones, I think14:58:09
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* note that we started requiring an active committer on the maintainers list for browsers 😉14:58:33
@hexa:lossy.networkhexanope, we don't do grandfathering for security14:58:47
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)

I agree that different standards for new vs. existing packages doesn't make sense

make me committer then :P

14:59:02
@hexa:lossy.networkhexasmh14:59:13
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa #security-discuss:nixos.org if you want to continue the banter 😜 14:59:47
@emantor:stratum0.orgEmantor changed their profile picture.19:32:12

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6