| 2 Dec 2025 |
 K900 | I don't think so, but it would be nice to have one | 06:49:49 |
 DavHau | done: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/467183 | 16:04:09 |
| K900 | I wonder how much it'll suck to just add it by default | 16:08:43 |
 hexa | could this work with python3Minimal? | 16:10:25 |
| DavHau | Let's add it by default later. I would like to make it available at all for now.
And yeah, good point, it should use python3Minimal | 16:11:49 |
| hexa | also not sure how fancy we want to go, but couldn't the hook be null in non-cross situations | 16:23:54 |
| hexa | that way we wouldn't have to guard it on every use | 16:24:14 |
| DavHau | I think it would be better to go the route to always include it by default. even in non-cross scenarios. the check is very cheap. | 16:25:21 |
| hexa | yeah, eventually | 21:44:33 |
| hexa | but until then it would ease adoption | 21:44:42 |
| 3 Dec 2025 |
| DavHau | I'm not sure, because maybe someone wants to use it in a non-cross scenario, and then they cannot, because it is null. | 03:42:34 |
|  xin joined the room. | 19:29:39 |
| 4 Dec 2025 |
|  Ido Samuelson joined the room. | 01:45:01 |
|  onur-ozkan joined the room. | 04:20:24 |
| DavHau | How could we prevent contributers from including setuptools-rust as a native build input and force the usage of the setuptoolsRustBuildHook instead?
I've been seeing this multiple times already and it always breaks cross. | 06:07:26 |
