| 26 Mar 2026 |
K900 | Which is the fix | 19:14:13 |
emily | there's no reason to replace sigtool with rcodesign here | 19:14:15 |
emily | ah ok | 19:14:16 |
K900 | I have not seen the other fix | 19:14:18 |
emily | I thought you meant the rcodesign one | 19:14:20 |
K900 | No I have not seen that and I am not qualified to merge it | 19:14:29 |
emily | which, maybe we should rcodesign in general but I think it's not very sustainable/worthwhile right now without a compatible CLI | 19:14:36 |
Randy Eckenrode | Can we use a wrapper that’s good enough? | 21:54:18 |
emily | probably, although since it doesn't expose the signature-stripping operation we'd presumably just ignore those commands | 21:57:05 |
emily | at which point it's sorta the same as "teach sigtool to ignore those commands" | 21:57:12 |
Randy Eckenrode | Using rcodesign would allow us to support some of the scenarios that sigtool doesn’t like signing bundles. | 22:01:25 |
Sarah Clark | If you haven't looked at zh.fail in a while, the number of Darwin breakages is a thing to behold https://zh.fail/ | 22:15:51 |
| 27 Mar 2026 |
Ihar Hrachyshka | not sure how to interpret it. is it good or is smth really broken? | 01:07:16 |
viraptor | It's good. Number of broken packages falling. | 01:08:45 |
Ihar Hrachyshka | and I guess darwin is now in "better" shape just because it doesn't have as many packages? | 01:09:59 |
Ihar Hrachyshka | * and I guess darwin is now in "better" shape than linujx just because it doesn't have as many packages? | 01:10:07 |
Ihar Hrachyshka | * and I guess darwin is now in "better" shape than linux just because it doesn't have as many packages? | 01:10:12 |
viraptor | Likely. There are lots of broken kernels on Linux for example | 01:27:55 |
| Oliver Schmidt joined the room. | 11:17:34 |
Sarah Clark | Partly that, partly focused work on the worst offenders | 17:31:57 |
Lisanna | Could someone checkout https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/15451 and run nix build .#checks.aarch64-darwin.nix-store-tests-run? I got a SIGTRAP in the CI but I don't see how it's related to my change | 21:55:23 |
Lisanna | * Could someone run nix build github:lisanna-dettwyler/nix/async-post-build-hook#checks.aarch64-darwin.nix-store-tests-run? I got a SIGTRAP in the CI but I don't see how it's related to my change | 22:00:27 |
| 28 Mar 2026 |
| @jan4843:matrix.org left the room. | 11:13:34 |
Ben Sparks | nix-store-tests-run> /nix/var/nix/builds/nix-build-nix-store-tests-run.drv-0/b/.attr-0l2nkwhif96f51f4amnlf414lhl4rv9vh8iffyp431v6s28gsr90: line 3: 8552 Trace/BPT trap: 5 /nix/store/hxmd8p181a49ris32jzld321dffks592-exec/bin/exec /nix/store/hq3q7d33i4464lsjiyy1y43kfh4cajaq-nix-store-tests-2.35.0pre/bin/nix-store-tests
| 13:17:58 |
Lisanna | thanks! | 20:56:54 |
viraptor | Could someone try to build https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/500850 please? I can't tell if it's my environment that's weird in some way. | 23:57:41 |
| 29 Mar 2026 |
eveeifyeve | Can someone tell me exactly what makeDarwinBundle does? | 13:38:41 |
eveeifyeve | Because I am currently in the process of upstreaming bundlers to nixpkgs and there is going to be makeBinaryBundle, makeAppImageBundle, makeDebBundle as apart of the bundle feature in nix. | 13:40:13 |
eveeifyeve | * Because I am currently in the process of upstreaming bundlers to nixpkgs and there is going to be makeBinaryBundle, makeAppImageBundle, makeDebBundle as apart of the bundle feature in nix. As privately spoken to tomberek. | 13:40:35 |
eveeifyeve |  Download image.png | 13:41:27 |