| 26 Mar 2026 |
 emily | I thought you meant the rcodesign one | 19:14:20 |
 K900 | No I have not seen that and I am not qualified to merge it | 19:14:29 |
| emily | which, maybe we should rcodesign in general but I think it's not very sustainable/worthwhile right now without a compatible CLI | 19:14:36 |
 Randy Eckenrode | Can we use a wrapper that’s good enough? | 21:54:18 |
| emily | probably, although since it doesn't expose the signature-stripping operation we'd presumably just ignore those commands | 21:57:05 |
| emily | at which point it's sorta the same as "teach sigtool to ignore those commands" | 21:57:12 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Using rcodesign would allow us to support some of the scenarios that sigtool doesn’t like signing bundles. | 22:01:25 |
 Sarah Clark | If you haven't looked at zh.fail in a while, the number of Darwin breakages is a thing to behold https://zh.fail/ | 22:15:51 |
| 27 Mar 2026 |
 Ihar Hrachyshka | not sure how to interpret it. is it good or is smth really broken? | 01:07:16 |
 viraptor | It's good. Number of broken packages falling. | 01:08:45 |
| Ihar Hrachyshka | and I guess darwin is now in "better" shape just because it doesn't have as many packages? | 01:09:59 |
| Ihar Hrachyshka | * and I guess darwin is now in "better" shape than linujx just because it doesn't have as many packages? | 01:10:07 |
| Ihar Hrachyshka | * and I guess darwin is now in "better" shape than linux just because it doesn't have as many packages? | 01:10:12 |
| viraptor | Likely. There are lots of broken kernels on Linux for example | 01:27:55 |
