| 17 Feb 2026 |
 Randy Eckenrode | macOS 26.4 is warning about Rosetta 2 use. | 00:42:26 |
 hexa | cool, let me accidentally update the build farm past that | 00:44:12 |
| hexa | cool, let me accidentally update the build farm past that | 00:44:16 |
| hexa | 26.05 is the final release with x86_64-darwin support, correct? | 00:44:42 |
 Ihar Hrachyshka |
when users launch an app that uses Rosetta 2, there will be a popup letting them know that the app will no longer work when support for Rosetta 2 ends.
what will happen on headless? (do we ever run .apps during builds?)
| 01:06:42 |
| Randy Eckenrode | That’s the current plan. I’d like to remove support sooner rather than later in the cycle if possible. | 02:05:11 |
 Sarah Clark | UPDATE: I patched out the offending pragmas on Darwin | 04:40:12 |
|  LogN changed their display name from Logan Devine to LogN. | 04:46:53 |
 Spore | Redacted or Malformed Event | 05:46:02 |
|  theutz changed their profile picture. | 17:16:50 |
| theutz changed their profile picture. | 17:17:37 |
| hexa | to be fair, we can immediately remove x86_64-darwin builds on unstable after the release | 23:25:34 |
| hexa | * we can immediately remove x86_64-darwin builds on unstable after the release | 23:25:40 |
| hexa | we could really use the capacity for aarch64-darwin | 23:25:49 |
| Randy Eckenrode | I’d like to do the actual removal shortly in that timeframe as well. | 23:30:11 |
| Randy Eckenrode | I think @emily has suggested we could keep it around if someone wants to do something with it, but I’d rather delete it so people can stop worrying about it. | 23:30:45 |
| Randy Eckenrode | * I think emily has suggested we could keep it around if someone wants to do something with it, but I’d rather delete it so people can stop worrying about it. | 23:31:00 |
 emily | I remember us being on opposite sides of that 😅 | 23:31:01 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Glad I remembered correctly. 😂 | 23:31:19 |
| emily | my position is that if someone wants to fund maintenance and infra then x86_64-darwin can stay until end of official support, otherwise yeet it | 23:31:27 |
| emily | and I somewhat doubt anyone does want that | 23:31:32 |
| emily | I would like to get an eval warning out for 26.05 though | 23:31:41 |
| emily | just so much to do :( | 23:31:45 |
| Randy Eckenrode | They can do that in their own fork like the LTS folks are doing AFAIK. | 23:32:22 |
| emily | if it resulted in a net overall effective increase in capacity and maintenance time for aarch64-darwin then it'd be fine to have it in-tree, but I doubt anyone has the funds for that, so it should just go | 23:36:13 |
| hexa | so after 26.05 is branched we stop building into it? | 23:39:32 |
| emily | it'll need to be built for 26.05 stable but yes | 23:39:45 |
| hexa | yes, and for 25.11 until EOL | 23:39:53 |
| hexa | but not unstable, not staging-next | 23:39:59 |
| emily | right | 23:40:05 |
