| 29 May 2026 |
| kfiz set a profile picture. | 23:10:45 |
| 30 May 2026 |
viraptor | Got a fix for you: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/525811 | 01:54:10 |
viraptor | * Got a fix for you. There was a lot of new weird stuff in macos26 icon generation: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/525811 | 01:55:03 |
kfiz | Thx. Works for me. Had to reboot though. When I was directly opening it with open result/Applications/Element.app my machine became unresponsive. After a reboot the app opened normally as part of loginwindow, i.e. as part ot the previously opened applications. | 03:05:33 |
viraptor | In reply to @kfiz:matrix.sopado.de Thx. Works for me. Had to reboot though. When I was directly opening it with open result/Applications/Element.app my machine became unresponsive. After a reboot the app opened normally as part of loginwindow, i.e. as part ot the previously opened applications. The icons are parsed by the system and apparently I can crash one of those services. Don't think about it too much. Definitely no security implications there... | 04:48:11 |
viraptor | * The icons are parsed by the system and apparently I can crash one of those services. (That's carried over from the previous bad file) Don't think about it too much. Definitely no security implications there... | 04:50:57 |
| ulucs joined the room. | 08:45:22 |
Randy Eckenrode | Anyone getting this warning on the nix-darwin 26.05 branch?
trace: warning: reckenrode profile: programs.man.generateCaches has no effect when programs.man.package is null
| 15:15:08 |
Austin Horstman | looks like a home manager warning | 15:23:14 |
Austin Horstman |  Download image.png | 15:23:40 |
Austin Horstman | https://github.com/nix-community/home-manager/pull/8723 | 15:25:47 |
Austin Horstman | looks like firefox devedition broke on darwin
> structuredAttrs is enabled
┃ > touch: cannot touch 'Developer': Permission denied
┃ > touch: cannot touch 'Edition.app/Contents/Resources/is-packaged-app': No such file or directory
┃ For full logs, run:
┃ nix log /nix/store/bbvd4lm0n7sxvj2rdh4niifiwwczp674-firefox-devedition-152.0b1.drv
| 15:28:49 |
Austin Horstman | looks like a simple quoting issue in a recent change | 15:33:27 |
Austin Horstman | K900: created a pr if you can take a look https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/525999 when you get a chance | 15:50:53 |
K900 | Ugh of course there's spaces | 15:51:31 |
Austin Horstman | thanks, appreciate it | 15:51:35 |
K900 | Merged | 15:51:39 |
| Matt Sturgeon joined the room. | 15:59:55 |
Matt Sturgeon | I was reviewing a PR that adds 2 packages with platforms = darwin, but noticed CI shows zero rebuilds on darwin. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/461881#discussion_r3328961031
Does anyone here have any ideas? I don't have any darwin hardware, so I can't verify whether the packages actually evaluate on darwin or not.
Could be a packaging/eval issue, a CI issue, or a weird quirk I'm unaware of.
| 16:02:33 |
Austin Horstman | might be unsupported dependencies, i can test eval stuff | 16:08:10 |
Matt Sturgeon | Thanks for investigating.
eval-only — I can't build darwin
Ah, did you use something like pkgsCross?
| 16:28:58 |
Austin Horstman | there are some build issues | 16:30:08 |
Austin Horstman | i'm testing some changes | 16:30:25 |
Austin Horstman | * there are some build issues with sparkle | 16:31:08 |
samasaur | In reply to @reckenrode:matrix.org
Anyone getting this warning on the nix-darwin 26.05 branch?
trace: warning: reckenrode profile: programs.man.generateCaches has no effect when programs.man.package is null
FYI that branch exists but the PR to make it actually a stable release branch hasn't gone in yet so it is currently pointing to the exact same commit as master | 16:35:44 |
Austin Horstman | got it to build | 16:41:52 |
Austin Horstman |  Download image.png | 16:41:56 |
Matt Sturgeon | Now I'm curious if any of the issues you identified also apply to the other minecraft launchers already packaged in nixpkgs 👀 prismlauncher was originally a polymc fork, for example | 17:09:33 |
Matt Sturgeon | * Now I'm curious if any of the issues you identified also apply to the other minecraft launchers already packaged in nixpkgs 👀
prismlauncher was originally a polymc fork; pandora-launcher was recently merged, etc | 17:14:41 |
Matt Sturgeon | * Now I'm curious if any of the issues you identified also apply to the other minecraft launchers already packaged in nixpkgs 👀
prismlauncher was originally a polymc fork; pandora-launcher was recently merged (but doesn't define meta.platforms), etc | 17:16:06 |