| 9 Dec 2021 |
Dandellion | we've been asking for years | 14:16:55 |
Janne Heß | I can probably just recreate it. It's like 3 paths and will look pretty similar | 14:17:23 |
Janne Heß | * I can probably just recreate it. It's like 3 paths and it will already look pretty similar | 14:17:30 |
Janne Heß | (or 2 paths and a literal "m") | 14:18:06 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | https://twitter.com/grhmc/status/1468948967455141891 | 14:21:52 |
Dandellion | The reason they dont have a license attached already is because they want to protect it from being used on not-matrix stuff | 14:23:53 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | Janne Heß: I think the license is on what it depicts, not the literal bits in the file | 14:23:57 |
Janne Heß | In reply to @grahamc:nixos.org Janne Heß: I think the license is on what it depicts, not the literal bits in the file Probably, yeah. Licensing is a horrible topic | 14:24:22 |
Dandellion | trademark shit is really difficult so they just haven't specified, and yeah | 14:24:37 |
| andrew left the room. | 14:24:58 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | sure, maybe they can give us a one-off license :) | 14:25:14 |
Janne Heß | one thing we could do is have the [ and ] but with a black nix logo in the middle. don't now if that would look greath though… | 14:25:45 |
Janne Heß | * one thing we could do is have the [ and ] but with a black nix logo in the middle. don't now if that would look great though… | 14:25:56 |
Dandellion | I think most people have come to the conclusion that an [m] is too simple to not be public domain or something though | 14:26:01 |
Linux Hackerman | wow already got a reply though | 14:27:25 |
Janne Heß | that does feel like a one-off license | 14:28:21 |
hexa | https://twitter.com/matrixdotorg/status/1468951190343864326 | 14:30:53 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | yeah let's go for it | 14:36:41 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | it should appear here ~soon https://web.archive.org/web/20211209143739/https://twitter.com/matrixdotorg/status/1468951043719397387 | 14:38:58 |
Janne Heß |  Download image.png | 17:15:45 |
Janne Heß | what do y'all think of this? | 17:15:57 |
Janne Heß | I find it sad that the [ ] are so thin but I didn't want to change the logo | 17:19:16 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | cc samueldr | 17:22:12 |
[0x4A6F] | Do we want to generate logos for the nixos.$LANGUAGE_CODE channels with appropriate language codes? | 17:27:04 |
Janne Heß | That is probably not so hard because you could just extract the flag from an emoji font and take the average color for the line below | 17:29:07 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | I'd be happy to set them as a default, sure | 17:48:06 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | right now I make room avatars via:
make_avatar() (
room_id=$1
roomhash=$(md5sum <<<"$room_id" | cut -d' ' -f1)
filename="$scratch/$roomhash.avatar"
curl "https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/${roomhash}?d=identicon&f=y&s=2048" > "$filename"
echo "$filename"
)
and we could make it more complicated
| 17:48:47 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | I take care to do it in a way that makes it clear (programatically) that it was auto-generated, and so if we do auto-generate some avatars I'd want to do the same thing | 17:49:37 |
ckie (they/them) | In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de That is probably not so hard because you could just extract the flag from an emoji font and take the average color for the line below median would make more sense, no? | 20:32:57 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | let's move to #matrix-discussion:nixos.org ? | 20:39:28 |