| 13 Jun 2025 |
 @magic_rb:numtide.com | that | 15:18:22 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | just applied patch | 15:18:26 |
 emily | you directly applied that patch? | 15:18:30 |
| emily | ok | 15:18:31 |
 K900 | But also do you actually have a public IPv4? | 15:18:56 |
| K900 | @magic_rb | 15:19:01 |
| K900 | Because like, UPnP does not make sense behind CGNAT | 15:19:10 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | yeah | 15:19:11 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | public and static by contract | 15:19:15 |
| K900 | Then have fun I guess | 15:19:43 |
| K900 | I haven't even tried to set up UPnP because, well, CGNAT | 15:19:52 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | yeah i dont want to | 15:21:19 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | if it was up to me i wouldnt | 15:21:28 |
| K900 | I mean if they're using it for gaming, you can also probably just hard forward some UDP ports | 15:21:59 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | "BuT I WaNT uPNpD" | 15:22:23 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | * "BuT I WaNT uPNp" | 15:22:26 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | 🤷♂️ | 15:22:30 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | also the answer is no | 15:22:58 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | ew ew ew | 15:27:12 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | ew upnp | 15:27:18 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | miniupnpd has to run as root because it wants to directly write into the fucking firewall | 15:27:33 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | and there is no backend which would allow me to split the upnp implementation from the "editing the firewall" part | 15:28:04 |
| @magic_rb:numtide.com | ew | 15:28:09 |
| emily | K900: I am deeply unhappy to report that that patch does, in fact, fix PPPoE negotiation | 15:46:54 |
| emily | and v6 | 15:47:15 |
| emily | Q: why is it sending all the same things as OpenWrt and getting different results?
A: IT'S NOT SENDING THEM | 15:47:35 |
| K900 | Uhh | 15:48:16 |
| K900 | OK that's interesting | 15:48:19 |
| K900 | OK I wonder if | 15:49:04 |
| K900 | Just that last header change | 15:49:09 |
