NixOS Networking | 918 Members | |
| Declaratively manage your switching, routing, wireless, tunneling and more. | 267 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Jun 2021 | ||
| Okay seems simple from memory. Now to try it out heh | 00:37:55 | |
| iptables -A prerouting -t mangle -i wg0 -p tcp --dport 25 --jump MARK --set-mark 1 | 00:38:18 | |
| ip rule add priority 100 fwmark 0x1 lookup 100 | 00:38:50 | |
| ip route add default via 192.0.2.1 table 100 | 00:39:06 | |
| (in imperative speak) | 00:39:10 | |
| my worst enemy is ia_pd in networkd, can never get it work the first try | 00:44:17 | |
| It'd be nice if there was a wireless card intended for DIY'ers who just want to build an access point :P Give me two radios and no bluetooth on one pcie card... | 00:45:55 | |
| Upstream:
Downstream
| 00:46:29 | |
| and networkd doesn't ask the upstream for a prefix delegation | 00:47:07 | |
02:16:15.265641 IP6 (flowlabel 0x1cc9b, hlim 1, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 50) fe80::a89a:491a:e08d:6dd1.546 > ff02::1:2.547: [udp sum ok] dhcp6 inf-req (xid=3ec775 (option-request DNS-server DNS-search-list NTP-server SNTP-servers rapid-commit) (client-ID vid 0000ab11a51f239b) (elapsed-time 0)) | 00:47:12 | |
I remember that the downstream interface needs to actively use it for to be requested on the upstream interface, but I thought that networkConfig.DHCPv6PrefixDelegation = true; and networkConfig.IPv6SendRA = true; was enough | 00:48:15 | |
| 00:50:04 | ||
In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.orgI'm actually looking for something more: Give me something that looks like an AP with a nice-looking shell + good antenna, but with aarch64 running a hackable platform like openwrt | 00:50:08 | |
In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.orgThere's lots of dualband radios on one card, also without bluetooth (QCA95xx, QCA61xx), but only one band at a time, so you ultimately need two. | 00:50:24 | |
| Zhaofeng Li: Unifi 6 LR is armv8 | 00:50:48 | |
| hexa: Right, I meant one card that could do both at the same time. That'd be neat | 00:50:50 | |
In reply to @hexa:lossy.networkYeah, but too bad the firmware isn't that hackable (I mean you can get root and so stuff, but it's pretty limiting) | 00:51:49 | |
| I have two unifi aps at home which work just fine, but I wished I had more control | 00:52:22 | |
In reply to @hexa:lossy.network* Yeah, but too bad the firmware isn't that hackable (I mean you can get root and do stuff, but it's pretty limiting) | 00:52:31 | |
| I don't understand the limitations you describe though? | 00:52:39 | |
| 00:53:06 | |
| hexa I probably need to forward 25 from wg0 to eth0 on my remote as well right? | 00:53:09 | |
| Can you install custom firmware on those things? I thought the updates are all signed | 00:53:22 | |
| 00:53:47 | |
| https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commit;h=634c13c186646aff2badb51a43b248825d0fe5a0 | 00:54:28 | |
In reply to @noah:matrix.chatsubo.cafeNo, iptables just needs to mark that traffic, the rest happens with routing based on that fwmark | 00:55:02 | |
In reply to @hexa:lossy.networkWow nice, I might actually consider it | 00:55:26 | |
| Dual A53 (1,36 GHz) | 00:55:50 | |
| https://www.mediatek.com/products/homenetworking/mt7622 | 00:56:12 | |
| Well, it's an AP so it doesn't matter that much | 00:56:15 | |