| 29 Jun 2025 |
 emily | so | 15:02:48 |
| emily | apparently at least one of these plugins pulls in WebKitGTK | 15:02:54 |
| emily | for captive portals | 15:02:55 |
 hexa | yes, but no, but yes 🫠| 15:03:16 |
| hexa | capitve portal support kinda important | 15:03:36 |
 K900 | These are all the upstream developed plugins | 15:03:40 |
| K900 | I think | 15:03:41 |
| hexa | but not for the price of a webkitgtk | 15:03:42 |
| K900 | I don't think we should ship them on the minimal image though | 15:03:53 |
| K900 | People with fancy VPN setups probably want the graphical anyway | 15:04:02 |
| hexa | we shouldn't ship them on graphical either | 15:04:13 |
| hexa | the images are too big already lmao | 15:04:29 |
| emily | I'm git blameing | 15:04:35 |
| emily | I will have answers soon | 15:04:38 |
| emily | currently I am in 2015 | 15:05:08 |
| emily | I think it's fine for graphical fwiw | 15:05:56 |
| hexa | the graphical iso is close to 4 GiB | 15:06:21 |
| hexa | and the minimal is already around 1.7 GiB | 15:06:41 |
| emily | the graphical ISO already has two WebKitGTKs :P | 15:07:13 |
| emily | and always will have at least one | 15:07:15 |
| emily | that's not changing, it's a hard dependency of GNOME | 15:07:26 |
| emily | anyway, I'm arriving at things like fb5a616b020b9a769021add02379a431ea507a83 | 15:07:31 |
