Hydra | 385 Members | |
| 109 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Dec 2022 | ||
You're looking for an "aggregate" jobset. There are some examples in Nixpkgs, I believe (look for release.nix or similarly-named files in nixos/). Also present in the Nix (the tool) flake, and probably the Hydra flake / repo as well. | 00:40:14 | |
| * You're looking for an "aggregate" job. There are some examples in Nixpkgs, I believe (look for `release.nix` or similarly-named files in `nixos/`). Also present in the Nix (the tool) flake, and probably the Hydra flake / repo as well. | 00:40:40 | |
| Is it normal that my hydra queries narinfos from itself or did I mess something up? | 10:18:55 | |
| It will use any substituter, including itself if configured as substituter | 10:20:23 | |
| Do I want this or does that slow down things? I have the feeling that sometimes jobs just stale a longer time which may be related to that. | 10:21:05 | |
Also is warning: 7 concurrent database updates; PostgreSQL may be stalled normal? postgres itself seems to be happy. | 10:21:16 | |
In reply to @sandro:supersandro.deI don't think it makes any sense. It pushes the required store paths to builders anyway and substituting from itself will never yield any success | 10:21:38 | |
In reply to @sandro:supersandro.deThat's normal | 10:21:43 | |
In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.dethanks for clarifying. Then I can turn it off and maybe hydra gets going faster | 10:25:05 | |
| it feels usually a bit slow for running one concurrent build | 10:25:20 | |
| Would you recommend to increase narinfo-cache-negative-ttl when you rebuild from stage0? Would there be anything else you would suggest to set? | 11:17:37 | |
| maybe disable use of binary caches completely if you're doing that? | 11:18:00 | |
| I am only doing it for one job of 8 | 11:19:22 | |
In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deby default, the builders do substitute tho. it's like nix-copy-close -s. | 12:35:08 | |
| 13:08:37 | ||
| 14:38:26 | ||
| How do I reset an error message like?
My hydra machines file looks like | 15:00:06 | |
| 3 Dec 2022 | ||
| does anybody want to take a look at https://github.com/NixOS/hydra/pull/1263? %) | 12:10:50 | |
| 4 Dec 2022 | ||
| 14:19:49 | ||
| 5 Dec 2022 | ||
In reply to @cole-h:matrix.orgThanks Cole, this does look like what I need. | 00:22:06 | |
What's the status of determinate's terraform hydra provider? I see a few open PRs and a latest commit on main from August - is it under active development internally, feature complete, something else? | 00:24:50 | |
In reply to @jackdk:matrix.org(This is my personal opinion, not that of my employer) I consider it fairly feature complete. 2 of the 3 draft PRs that touch the actual provider depend on upstream PRs being merged. That 3rd draft PR implements support for something that has been merged upstream, but I just never got around to finishing it 🤷 | 16:31:46 | |
| Thanks very much. | 21:42:28 | |
| 6 Dec 2022 | ||
| 12:16:07 | ||
| 14:10:23 | ||
| 7 Dec 2022 | ||
| 09:10:18 | ||
| 9 Dec 2022 | ||
| So, after fiddling around with containerized hydra on aarch64 server and trying to get it working as a builder (and not really getting anywhere with that), we decided to go for a hydra (master) running directly on ubuntu+nix without containers. All docs I have found so far talk about installation on x86 and nixos. Any pointers to docs about installation on ubuntu+nix and/or aarch64, would be appreciated. | 08:31:52 | |
In reply to @terwiz:matrix.orgThat sounds like a path of great resistance. I don't think anyone really does that :/ | 09:14:42 | |
| aarch64 should be no problem, but outside nixos will definitely be a lot more effort and probably pain than on nixos | 09:25:26 | |
| Why do you have to use Ubuntu? And what went wrong with using a container? | 09:26:50 | |