!zghijEASpYQWYFzriI:nixos.org

Hydra

393 Members
112 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
4 Apr 2024
@k900:0upti.meK900And honestly you're just describing distcc09:11:06
@k900:0upti.meK900(though it's still not entirely Decentralized(tm), not that it needs to be)09:11:26
@delroth:delroth.net@delroth:delroth.netany time someone suggests using IPFS I just assume they have no clue about anything related to distributed computing, so far the heuristic has always worked09:12:41
@k900:0upti.meK900Also, MDM and Decentralized(tm) don't go together09:12:45
@k900:0upti.meK900For reasons that should hopefully be obvious09:12:59
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlMindavi
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Without effectively rewriting Hydra entirely
And nix too, since eval is quite memory hungry. Distribution of that will add a lot of transfer overhead and complication to evaluation, I feel.
12:11:32
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.dedas_jRedacted or Malformed Event13:18:03
@mrtrk:matrix.orgMarco TurchettoHas anyone ever tried to deploy all the hydra components separately? from what I understood hydra architecture is meant to be distributed and use postgresql as a message bus13:48:12

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6